5. Business Model: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
imported>Scott McGregor No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{LuxEarPage | {{LuxEarPage | ||
|author = Scott McGregor | |author = Scott McGregor | ||
|start = 2025-05- | |start = 2025-05-12 | ||
|due = | |due = | ||
|assessment = | |assessment = Verified re-export for full Go-To-Market doc | ||
|actionitems = | |actionitems = | ||
* Review | * Review | ||
|content = | |content = | ||
Revenue streams: | Revenue streams: | ||
Latest revision as of 10:02, 12 May 2025
Summary[edit source]
- Author: Scott McGregor
- Start Date: 2025-05-12
- Due Date:
- Assessment Criteria: Verified re-export for full Go-To-Market doc
- Action Items:
-
* Review
Content[edit source]
Revenue streams: Direct sale of custom-fit eartips Subscription model for replacements B2B fit data licensing and co-branding with audio brands Margins: High due to local printing, low shipping, and no traditional inventorCompetitive Advantage First scalable solution combining in-store scanning + local fulfillment Like Dr. Scholl’s kiosks or Luxottica lens grinding — but for ears Brands retain loyalty; we improve their product performance
Sources[edit source]
No sources cited.